Asking who we are or ought to be is a question asked across time, uniquely in Confucius’ teachings, he asked who we are in relation to each other and the world we live in.
Confucius was a man of many words, as shown in A Source Book In Chinese Philosophy, translated and compiled by Wing-Tsit Chan. Confucius was one of the few men who revolutionized society, imploring acts and feelings of love, care, and benevolence. He called this
The Analects, a compiled book of Confucius’ teachings and discussions, has been written and rewritten over the past 2,000 years. And for this reason, nearly every word used in the Analects has been taught to have a multitude of meanings. For instance, humanity (jen) can also be translated into words that are synonymous to nature and/or human nature, as well as the aforementioned love, care, benevolence, and respect.
Defining jen in English may be difficult, but comparing it to other non-English words is advantageous to understanding jen. Shortly after Confucianism, also within Eastern Philosophy, Daoism further reflected on the nature of the Way (Dao). Jen is the adjective/noun as the Dao is the verb/noun. Jen is how one ought to be as the Dao is the way one is going; one cannot follow the Dao if they are not one with jen. In addition, the Danish philosophy of hygge is roughly translated to living in and expressing outwardly feelings of positivity, comfort, freedom, as said by CEO of the Happiness Research Institute, Meik Wiking, “the art of creating nice atmosphere.” All of these philosophies have to do with being one with the world, with nature, with jen.
While the term Dao was not coined until after the passing of Confucius, he often spoke of the Way, the Dao, in the same relation that Daoist works do. To have humanity and one’s will (chi) focused on the Way (7:6), is the answer to all questions. Within the Analects, there are many thoughts from Confucius as well as questions posed by his disciples and then his answer. When presented hypothetical questions on humanity, Confucius would generally answer that the man within the questions would do as he ought to because with humanity he will not know what he ought not to do. These vague, poetical responses are open to interpretation but predominately point to one answer: follow the Dao through jen with chi. And this is the way that Confucius, Daoists, the Danish, view nature as to be an autonomous will, as Nature.
Often times the answers Confucius gave were formed negatively, to what a man would not do, as in without
Man is as a tree, both seemingly with and in defiance of Nature, but is merely moving with Nature. It is Man’s
Nature and the Dao, as an autonomous will, cannot be controlled. That is why the tree cannot be upset when it falls because it is bound to fall. Likewise, with Man, a man ought not to be upset if he finds he will die, for he already knew it is inevitable. With